IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning
  • Cilt: 13 Sayı: 4
  • Comparison of 3D Printing Technology and Reinforced Concrete Frame Systems: An Exploratory Study

Comparison of 3D Printing Technology and Reinforced Concrete Frame Systems: An Exploratory Study

Authors : Hatice Ceylan, Ekrem Bahadır Çalışkan
Pages : 589-605
View : 192 | Download : 514
Publication Date : 2025-12-30
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :This paper compares 3D printing technology with the conventional reinforced concrete frame system in the context of building construction. By conducting an extensive literature review, the study examines the technical, material, and time aspects of both methods. A fictional single-store residential project of 150 m² was designed initially to assess and evaluate each approach descriptively. The analysis covers the design stage, construction processes, timeframes, labor requirements, costs, and environmental implications. The comparison shows that 3D printing can reduce overall construction duration to approximately 1–1.5 months by eliminating formwork, minimizing curing times, and automating material placement. It also enables greater design flexibility, particularly for complex geometries, while generating less construction waste. Nevertheless, its adoption is currently constrained by limitations in material diversity, equipment scale, regulatory standards, and technical expertise. Besides, the implementation of 3D printing has limits on building heights and floors. Conversely, the reinforced concrete frame system remains widely used for large-scale and high-rise projects due to its proven structural performance, established codes, and material availability. Although it generally requires 5–6 months to complete, it demands more labor-intensive processes. The findings suggest that 3D printing holds significant potential for small to medium-scale buildings and rapid construction scenarios, especially where time efficiency and waste reduction are priorities. This comparative perspective offers practical insights for integrating digital fabrication into contemporary construction practice.
Keywords : 3D Baskı, Betonarme Çerçeve, İnşaat Teknolojisi, Karşılaştırmalı Analiz, Eklemeli Üretim

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026