IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Kültür ve İletişim
  • Cilt: 28 Sayı: 55
  • The Partisan vs. The Militant: The Janus-Face of Maoist Politics

The Partisan vs. The Militant: The Janus-Face of Maoist Politics

Authors : Ömür Birler, Batuhan Parmaksız
Pages : 51-73
Doi:10.18691/kulturveiletisim.1623046
View : 38 | Download : 9
Publication Date : 2025-03-28
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :This study explores the juxtaposition of Carl Schmitt’s partisan and Alain Badiou’s militant as political subjects by revealing their foundational reliance on Mao Tse-tung’s ideas. Central to this discussion is the influence of Mao’s revolutionary praxis, which serves as an unexpected common point between these two opposing theorists. The dual events of the Chinese Revolution and the Cultural Revolution that set Mao’s role as a partisan warrior for Schmitt and a militant of mass movements for Badiou present us with a complicated picture. The study argues that the role of violence in Schmitt’s and Badiou’s theories provides the key to moving beyond a superficial comparison between the two thinkers. To that end, the study first presents Schmitt’s reading of Mao. By focusing on Theory of the Partisan, his justification for violence is analyzed through a detailed examination of its destructive logic, militaristic form, and its ultimate purpose of reproducing the state’s power. In contrast, the examination of Badiou’s Maoist roots reveals a militant subject that embodies universalist and transformative politics by employing the subtractive logic of violence. This, the study argues, creates new political possibilities that challenge existing structures without succumbing to state-centric paradigms. By situating Mao’s thought within the broader discourse on violence and political subjectivity, the study demonstrates how historical and theoretical legacies continue to shape contemporary debates on the nature and purpose of politics. Ultimately, it contributes to political theory by delineating the distinct yet interconnected roles of Schmitt’s partisan and Badiou’s militant, while highlighting Mao’s enduring relevance.
Keywords : Alain Badiou, Carl Schmitt, Mao Tse-tung, Kültür Devrimi, partizan, militant.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026