COMPARISON OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT FRAMEWORK MATERIALS BEFORE AND AFTER CEMENTATION: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Authors : Cevdet ÇALIŞKAN, Fatih DEMİRCİ, Merve BİRGEALP ERDEM

Pages : 28-45

Doi:10.55895/sshs.1050112

View : 21 | Download : 15

Publication Date : 2022-04-30

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :Purpose: This study aimed to compare the marginal adaptation of different framework materials polyetheretherketone insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(PEEK);, zirconia, and cobalt-chromium insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Co-Cr); through direct metal laser sintered insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(DMLS); and conventional casting insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(CC); in fixed prosthetic restorations. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 stainless steel dies were embedded in silicone molds, and the master models obtained were divided into four groups insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(n=20);: PEEK, zirconia, Co-Cr through DMLS and CC frameworks. The vertical marginal gap was measured by stereomicroscope at ×20 magnification. In addition to descriptive statistics in the evaluation of data, one-way ANOVA was used with the post hoc multiple comparison test Tamhane’s T2, as the data were normally distributed and variances differed according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in vertical marginal gap before and after cementation in all groups insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p<0.05);. Conclusion: Before and after cementation, vertical marginal gap values of laser sintered Co-Cr, zirconia, and PEEK frameworks were clinically acceptable. Keywords: PEEK; Marginal Adaptation; Laser Sintered Co-Cr; Zirconia; Framework
Keywords : PEEK, Marginal Adaptation, Laser Sintered Co Cr, Zirconia, Framework