IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Bozok Tıp Dergisi
  • Volume:14 Issue:3
  • IS YOUTUBE REALLY A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON MRI GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY? MR Eşliğinde Prostat Biyops...

IS YOUTUBE REALLY A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON MRI GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY? MR Eşliğinde Prostat Biyopsisi Konusunda Youtube Bilgi Kaynağı mı?

Authors : Merve Şam Özdemir, Harun Özdemir
Pages : 184-189
View : 47 | Download : 36
Publication Date : 2024-09-15
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this review was to evaluate the overall quality of the information in YouTube™ videos about prostate MRI-guided biopsy and whether it describes the procedure. Material and Methods: The terms \" MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate\" and \"MRI targeted prostate biopsy\" were searched on YouTube. The first 118 videos of the results were selected, and the written information of the British Association of Urological Surgeons for transrectal ultrasound-guided MRI fusion biopsy was performed. For MRI-guided prostate biopsy, four more questions were added to the MRI-guided prostate biopsy criteria and reviewed by two authors.. The reliability and quality of the content of these videos included in the study were evaluated using JAMA and GQS scores. Results: A total of 118 videos were reviewed; 3 videos were rated \"excellent\" and 56 videos were rated \"very poor\". 91 of the videos (77%) were prepared for physicians, and the remaining videos were prepared by non-physicians. The average duration of the videos was 9.8 minutes, and the average number of daily views was 14.3. The number of views varied between 19 and 710,399 (average: 21). While the average of likes was 62.5, the average of comments was 4.3. The average number of views was 4.3. The score was found to be 3.54 ± 0.5 out of 5. The GQS average was calculated as 4.42 ± 0.56 out of 5. When the videos uploaded by physicians and non-physicians were compared, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the average duration of the videos, JAMA scores, or number of comments. The number of daily views, number of likes, total number of views, GQS, and scoring criteria were statistically higher in the videos prepared by non-physicians. Conclusion: Information about MRI-guided prostate biopsies on YouTube is not of a high enough standard to allow patients to make informed decisions. Therefore, healthcare professionals must produce high-quality, informative, patient-focused medical YouTube videos.
Keywords : IS YOUTUBE REALLY A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON, MRI GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY, MR Eşliğinde Prostat Biyopsisi Konusunda Youtube Bilgi Kaynağı mı

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025