How Does Being Trusted Affect Sharing? Findings from the Ultimatum Game

Authors : Yıldırım Beyazıt Çiçen

Pages : 685-694

Doi:10.21121/eab.1261671

View : 186 | Download : 190

Publication Date : 2023-10-22

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :Individual personalities, situational factors, and social interactions impact the fair sharing of justice. This study was conducted on 412 adults and investigated how behaviors were shaped in the Ultimatum Game. Therefore, three cases were determined, and the bidder was instructed to divide 10 thousand TL first in the typical game. Afterward, it was said that the other person was in need, and the bid was requested to be renewed. At the last stage, bids were received if there was any doubt about the needy. Consistency analysis was performed with the Cronbach\'s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for the reliability. It was found that the scales used in the test were consistent. According to the typical game, people are more empathetic towards those in need and offer 6667 TL rather than 4264 TL. However, when a question of reliability is raised, 4658 TL is offered regardless of need. The study also found that women made higher offers to people in need than men. There was no statistical difference between the bids when the age range and graduation level differed. The findings show that the neoclassical economics concept of homo economicus, which seeks to maximize utility, is not valid in real life.
Keywords : Ultimatum game, Reliability, Sharing, Equity, Altruism

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL