A Comparative Analysis on Employee Training: Competency-based vs Traditional

Home Page
About
Submit A Journal
Submit A Conference
Submit Paper/Book
- Submit a Preprint
- Submit a Book
Contact

Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi
Volume:23 Issue:4
A Comparative Analysis on Employee Training: Competency-based vs Traditional

A Comparative Analysis on Employee Training: Competency-based vs Traditional

Authors : James Maunsellterry, Nazım Taşkin

Pages : 569-588

Doi:10.21121/eab.980800

View : 210 | Download : 442

Publication Date : 2023-10-22

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :The study examines competency-based and traditional based training programs, within the context of their effectiveness and impact on employee performance outcomes. Results found that employers have recognised the weakness of traditional training formats, with some placing a higher value on experience and proof of performance abilities, over academic and professional qualifications. The most prominent finding was that training formats must contain both traditional and competency-based elements. These two factors are in turn linked to directly impacting employee performance, and are suggested as being a more accurate longer term measure. The interviews revealed that employees consider that performance can be linked to and measured by a number of factors including productivity output, staff motivation, engagement, job satisfaction, retention, and customer satisfaction.
Keywords : Employee training, traditional training, competency based training, employee performance, qualitative

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.