Spontaneous Disaster Volunteer Selection Scale: Validity and Reliability Assessment

Authors : Melikşah Turan

Pages : 2630-2652

Doi:10.15869/itobiad.1711975

View : 66 | Download : 121

Publication Date : 2025-12-31

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :Although disaster management practices have advanced considerably in recent years, citizens who are the first to arrive at the disaster scene—due to geographical proximity and a strong motivation to help—continue to play critical roles in emergency response processes. Contemporary disaster management has evolved into a multi-actor framework involving professional response teams, volunteers, civil society organizations, and active citizens. Voluntary engagement has become an indispensable complement to public response capacity, particularly in sudden-onset and large-scale disasters. Nevertheless, the structural criteria governing volunteer participation in disaster response in many countries remain ambiguous. For effective integration, it is essential to establish systematic components such as selection protocols, training standards, role definitions, and responsibility frameworks. In this context, the present study aims to contribute to the development of an effective volunteer selection approach in disaster settings in Türkiye by evaluating the Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Spontaneous Volunteer Selection Scale developed by Martínez et al. (2021). The target population consisted of students at Erzurum Technical University, and a non-probability convenience sampling method was employed. To minimize sampling error, the sample size was determined to be 417 participants. The instrument was distributed online and in person during the data collection phase, and responses were collected in both digital and printed formats. The original scale was translated into Turkish following established linguistic and cultural validation procedures and subsequently pilot-tested. To assess construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was initially conducted, followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to verify the resulting factor structure. Internal consistency reliability was examined using Cronbach\\\'s alpha coefficient. EFA results revealed that five subdimensions explained 55.23% of the total variance. The CFA confirmed acceptable model fit indices for the 24-item, 5-factor structure (χ²/df = 2.229; CFI = 0.91; IFI = 0.91; GFI = 0.90; AGFI = 0.87; RMSEA = 0.054). The overall internal consistency was high (Cronbach\\\'s α = 0.88). Based on the findings, the Turkish version of the scale was confirmed to be a valid and reliable instrument comprising five dimensions—Knowledge, Skills/Capabilities, Behavior, Motivation, and Social Desirability—across 24 items.
Keywords : Afet Yönetimi, Geçerlilik, Güvenilirlik, Risk Yönetimi, Spontane Gönüllü.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL