IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi
  • Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2
  • Countering the Formidable Accuser: Plato’s Response to Aristophanes and the Problem of Misology

Countering the Formidable Accuser: Plato’s Response to Aristophanes and the Problem of Misology

Authors : Güncel Oğulcan Ülgen
Pages : 537-562
Doi:10.20981/kaygi.1668824
View : 102 | Download : 71
Publication Date : 2025-09-30
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :This paper examines the relationship between argumentation and misology. It argues that Plato’s reclamation of argument constitutes a philosophical response to the problem of misology. I claim that Aristophanes’ Clouds offers a devastating early critique of διαλέγεσθαι, to which Plato responds by reclaiming and reconfiguring it as διαλεκτική. The Clouds portrays the rise of sophistic teaching as a destabilizing force in Athenian society, fostering mistrust in argumentation while associating it with manipulation and distortion. This mistrust constitutes an early instance of misology, a concept that Plato later develops fully in the Phaedo. By analyzing the Euthydemus, I show how Plato responds to Aristophanes by distinguishing Socrates from the sophists and revealing the latter’s role in generating misology. The focus on the Euthydemus is deliberate: there is an intertextual relationship (both formal and thematic) between the Euthydemus and the Clouds that brings them into direct confrontation. In the Phaedo, Plato further argues that misology arises from repeated disappointment with arguments when wielded by those who, by refuting every position, instill universal mistrust in their listeners. Plato’s remedy is to rebuild trust in argumentation by emphasizing philosophy\\\'s commitment to inquiry, even in the face of uncertainty. Ultimately, this paper contends that while Aristophanes’ response to the crisis of argumentation is to ridicule and reject it, Plato offers a systematic alternative: he redefines διαλεκτική as a means of countering misology rather than producing it. In doing so, he not only defends philosophy from the charge of misology but also presents philosophy as the only possible cure for misology.
Keywords : Mizoloji, Diyalektik, Eristik, Antilojik, Sofistik

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026