IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi
  • Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4
  • DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ARC TREATMENT PLANS IN PATIENTS WITH BILATERAL SURRENAL METASTASE...

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ARC TREATMENT PLANS IN PATIENTS WITH BILATERAL SURRENAL METASTASES

Authors : Taha Erdoğan, Düriye Öztürk
Pages : 326-331
Doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.1524592
View : 27 | Download : 42
Publication Date : 2025-10-13
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study was designed for dosimetric comparison of different arc treatment plans to investigate the efficacy and safety of ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of bilateral adrenal gland metastases (AGM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 14 patients (12 males, 2 females) with AGM of 84 and Karnofsky performance score ≥70, we optimised single-volumetric arc therapy (S-VMAT) and multiple-volumetric arc therapy (M-VMAT) isocentric arc VMAT for SBRT treatments from October 2006 to January 2017. The maximum and mean organ doses in specific volumes of critical organs were examined. The differences between the monitor unit values were statistically analysed. RESULTS: S-VMAT plans had a better dose conformity index (COI) than M-VMAT plans, with a relative improvement of 4% (p=0.02). Similarly, S-VMAT plans had a significantly higher homogeneity index (HI) than M-VMAT plans, with a relative improvement of 13.8% (p=0.001). S-VMAT plans resulted in better UI and GI compared with M-VMAT, with relative improvements of 8.7% and 6.9% respectively (p=0.02). Mean MU per fraction was 2755.21±388.72 in S-VMAT and 4848.79±491.06 in M-VMAT. The S-VMAT schedules reduced MU per fraction used by 76% (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: S-VMAT has significantly protected OARs without compromising target coverage compared to the M-VMAT technique. Although the average time to prepare an S-VMAT plan is approximately four times that of an M-VMAT plan, this plan has demonstrated several inherent advantages, including a shorter treatment duration and fewer monitor units (MU). Consequently, it has reduced the quality of M-VMAT plans and caused an increase in the doses to organs at risk (OARs). Furthermore, as it has also caused an increase in the total number of MUs, the treatment duration has been extended and the number of MUs delivered to the patient has increased.
Keywords : Bilateral, Adrenal Gland Metastases, SBRT, VMAT

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026