A Comparison of IRT Vertical Scaling Methods in Determining of the Increase in Achievement of Science Education

Authors : Aylin ALBAYRAK SARI, Hülya KELECİOĞLU

Pages : 98-111

Doi:10.21031/epod.286221

View : 57 | Download : 16

Publication Date : 2017-04-03

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :This study is based on a vertical scaling implemented with reference to the Item Response Theory, and involves a comparison of vertical scaling results obtained through the application of proficiency estimation methods and calibration methods. The vertical scales thus developed were assessed with reference to the criteria of grade-to-grade growth, grade-to-grade variability, and the separation of grade distributions. The data used in the study pertains to a dataset composed of a total of 1500 students from twelve primary schools in the province of Ankara, characterized by different levels of socio-economic cultural development. The comparison of the findings pertaining to the first and the second sub-problems reveals that the mean differences found through separate calibration were lower than those applicable to concurrent calibration, while the standard deviation found in the case of separate calibration were again lower than the values established through concurrent calibration. Furthermore, the scale of impact in the case of separate calibration was again lower than the values applicable to concurrent calibration. The results reached for all three criteria, using the concurrent calibration method were ranked in the order ML < MAP < EAP, with ML leading to the lowest value while EAP producing the highest one. In case of separate calibration, on the other hand, the ranking of results was found to vary with reference to the criteria applied.
Keywords : Item response theory, vertical scaling, calibration methods, proficiency estimation methods

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL