IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • İran ve Turan Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi
  • Cilt: 8 Sayı: 15
  • NADER SOHRABI, REVOLUTION AND CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND IRAN

NADER SOHRABI, REVOLUTION AND CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE AND IRAN

Authors : Kenan Han
Pages : 93-99
View : 58 | Download : 156
Publication Date : 2025-12-30
Article Type : Other Papers
Abstract :This review reassesses Nader Sohrabi’s Revolution and Constitutionalism in the Ottoman Empire and Iran as a major comparative intervention that reframes 1906-08 as a trans imperial moment of “modular revolution.” Rather than reading the Iranian and Ottoman constitutional movements as belated imitations or insulated national episodes, the book demonstrates how actors selectively translated a circulating repertoire-catalysed by 1905 Russia-through distinct matrices of state capacity, coalition architecture, and logistical infrastructures. I situate Sohrabi within diffusion and contentious-politics theory (Tarrow, Tilly, Sewell) while testing his claims against core Ottomanist and Iranist historiography (Hanioglu, Zurcher, Ahmad; Afary, Abrahamian, Martin, Bayat, Katouzian) and political-sociological accounts of state formation (Findley; Cronin). Two analytic stress tests-mechanisms of circulation (print publics, exile/officer networks) and intra-case heterogeneity (Tabriz vs. Tehran; Salonica vs. Istanbul/eastern provinces)-clarify both the reach and the limits of “modularity,” suggesting how to render it a falsifiable analytic rather than a persuasive metaphor. The review argues that Sohrabi explains divergent outcomes without teleology: in the Ottoman case, constitutionalism becomes a technology of recentralization under CUP (Committee of Union and Progress) stewardship; in Iran, constitutional gains prove reversible absent coercive-fiscal consolidation. By provincializing Europe without provincializing the Middle East, Revolution and Constitutionalism offers a portable grammar for comparative revolution and imperial politics.
Keywords : Anayasal devrim, Modüler devrim, diffüzyon, İttihat ve Terakki, Kaçar İranı, devlet kapasitesi, koalisyon yapısı, 1906-1911

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026