Anthropocentric Model of Communication from The Perspective of Social Robotics

Home Page
About
Submit A Journal
Submit A Conference
Submit Paper/Book
- Submit a Preprint
- Submit a Book
Contact

International Positive Schools and Well-Being Congress
II. International Positive Schools and Well-Being Congress
Anthropocentric Model of Communication from The Perspective of Social Robotics

Anthropocentric Model of Communication from The Perspective of Social Robotics

Authors : Malgorzata Gruchola, Lukasz Sarowski

Pages : 186-198

View : 52 | Download : 14

Publication Date : 2024-05-29

Abstract :The term "algorithmic turn" has already taken root in scientific discourse (Uricchio, 2011). Numerous researchers write about the formation of "algorithmic identity" (Cheney-Lippold, 2011), "algorithmic life" (Amoore, Piotukh, 2016). Attempts are being made to define, "sociology of algorithms" (Szpunar, 2019). We are also witnessing the formation of a new humanoid model of communication, which is an environment for the expansion of non-human entities. Research questions: 1. what implications does the humanoid model of communication, based on artificial intelligence technology, have? 2. what changes does it imply in the perception of the role and function of humans in the age of algorithms and AI? The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate, through an analysis of the literature on the subject, that the humanoid model of communication can be the source of human deanthropocentrism. Anthropocentrism places the human individual at the center of research interests. It recognizes the primacy of humans and what is human over other non-human entities (such as humanoid robots). Following Ewa Binczyk, we will consider four dimensions of anthropocentrism: 1. cognitive, 2. ontological, 3. methodological, and 4. axiological. Research hypotheses: H1: The application of AI technologies in communication implies changes in all four types of anthropocentrism (cognitive, ontological, methodological, axiological) distinguished by Ewa Binczyk, shaping human deanthropocentrism. H2: The design of social AI leads to the perception of humanoids in terms that go beyond treating them objectively. This perspective implies a change in the role of humans in the communication model. Research methods: analysis and synthesis Conclusions: The conclusions of the analysis allow confirmation of the research hypotheses. The design of social AI leads to the perception of humanoids in terms that go beyond treating them objectively. This perspective implies a change in the role of humans in the communication model.
Keywords : Social Robotics, Artificial Intelligence

ORIGINAL PAPER URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.