SDÜ Öğrencilerinin demografik, ekonomik ve psikososyal özelliklerinin incelenmesi

Authors : Sıtkı Orak, Betül Yavuz, Esin Keşçi, Hatice Aşık

Pages : 0-0

Doi:10.17343/sdutfd.59262

View : 17 | Download : 5

Publication Date : 2009-03-19

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :SüleymanDemirel Üniversitesi TIP FAKÜLTESİ DERGİSİ: 2001 ; 8insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(1); SDÜ Öğrencilerinin demografik, ekonomik ve psikososyal özelliklerinin incelenmesi Sıtkı ORAK, Betül YAVUZ, Esin KEŞÇİ, Hatice AŞIK Özet Üniversite öğrencisi adolesan çağın 18-24 yaşlan olan geç döneminde bulunur. Somatik ve psikolojik etkileşim içinde olan üniversite öğrencilerinin tutum ve davranışlarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Mayıs 1998`de Süleyman Demirel Üniver¬sitesi nin Isparta kentindeki fakülte ve yüksek okullarında okuyan 11338 öğrenciden 712 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%63); sine olasılıksız örnekleme yöntemi ile anket uygulanmıştır. Ankete katılan öğrencilerin 378 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%53.1); i erkek, 334 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%46.9); ü kız idi. Öğrencilerin 667 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%93.7); si 1. - 4. sınıflarda okuyan ve 584 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 82,0); ü 1975-1979 doğumlular oluşturmaktadır. Ankete giren 17-26 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(+); yaş erkek ve kız öğrencilerin ortalama ağırlığı 70.74 kg, 54.9 kg ve ortalama boy uzunlukları 177.4 cm, 162.9 cm bulundu. Erkekler ile kızların ağırlık ve boy uzunlukları arasında istatistiksel yönden önemli bir fark vardı insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ti: 15.7 t2:4.7, p<0.05);. Öğrencilerin 454 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 63.8); i lise, 172 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 24.2); si meslek lisesi ve 86 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%12.l); sı diğer liselerden mezun idi. Öğrencilerin geldikleri illerin ekonomik gelişmişliğine göre oranları 294 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 41.3); ü İsparta ye dengi illerden, 49 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 6.9); u daha düşük, 363 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 51.0); ü daha gelişmiş illerden idi. Öğrenciler aylık gelirlerim 493 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 69.2); ü ailesinden, 9 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 1.3); u sadece kredi/burstan yararlanırken, 50 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 7); si çalışarak, 133 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 18.7); ü aile + kredi/burstan sağlıyor. Gelirini yeterli bulan 446 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 62.5); ve yeterli bulmayan 266 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%`37.2); idi. Öğrencileri psikososyal yönden etkileyen faktörler; sosyal çevre 286 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 27.3);, aileden ayrılık 163 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 15.4);, parasal 163 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 15.4);, eğitime bağlı 143 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 13.5);, yöresel 136 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 12.8);, konaklama 81 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 7.6); ve diğer 84 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 7.9); idi. Bu koşullar¬da öğrencilerin başarı durumları; 62insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%8.7); si çok iyi, 278insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%39.0); i iyi, 280insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%39.3); i orta, 64insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%9.0); ü zayıfve26insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%3.7); sı fena olduğu görüldü. Anahtar Kelimeler: Üniversite öğrencisi, demografik, ekonomik, psikososyal ve başarı Abstract Investigation of demographic, economic and psychpcocial characteristick of the students of Süleyman Demirel Üniversty University students are at the ages of 18-24 which is the end of the adolescence period. it is aimed to ınvestigate the behaviours and the actions of the students who are somatically and psychologically interacting each other. A guestiannaire with the tech-nigue of illustrating without probability was carried out on 712 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%6.3); ofthe 11338 stu¬dents who are studying in the faculties and institute of Süleyman Demirel University in Isparta. 378 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%53.l); of the students were male and 334 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%46.9); of the m were female. 667 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%93.7); ofthe students were attending to 1-4 classes and 584 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%82); ofthem were born in between the years 1975-1979. İt wasfound that the average weights of the male and female students, who were at the ages of 17-26insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(+);, were 70.74 kg and 54.9 kg and the average heights of them were 177.4 cm and 162.9 cm. There was an important sta-tistical difference between the average weights and heights of the male and female stu¬dents insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ti: 15.712:4.7, p<0.05);. 454 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%63.8); ofthe students graduated from high school, 172 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%24.2); ofthem graduated from high schoolsfor profession and 86 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%12.I); ofthem graduated from other high schools. According to the proportions of the economical developments ofthe cities 294 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%4J.3); ofthe students werefrom İsparta and its equals, 49 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%6.9); of them were f rom less developed cities and 363 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%51); of them were f rom more developed cities. 493 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%69.2); ofthe students were providing their monthly incomes from their families, 50 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%7); of them by vvorking, 133 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%18.7); of them from their fami-lies and scholarship whereas 9 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%1.3); of them \vere providing onlyfrom scholarship. 446 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%62.5); ofthe students thought that their incomes were adequate and 266 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%37.2); of them thought that they \vere inadequate. Thefactors affecting the students psychoso-cially were these; social environment 286 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%27.3);, being awayfrom home 163 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%15.4);, monetary 163 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%15.4);, educational 143 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%13.5);, local 136 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%12.8);, accommodation 81 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 7.6); and others 84 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%7.9);. Under these condition success ofthe 62 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%8.7); ofthe stu¬dents was very good, 278 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%39); of them was good, 280 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(% 39.3); of them was normal, 64 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%9); of them was bad and 26 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(%3.7); of them was very bad. Keywords: University students, demographic, economic, psychosocial and success
Keywords :