A Comparative Study on the Architectural and Symbolic Values of Masjid al-Haram and Masjid an-Nabawi

Authors : Nilgün Çevik

Pages : 333-369

Doi:10.47424/tasavvur.1652204

View : 50 | Download : 29

Publication Date : 2025-06-30

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :Throughout human history, places of worship, such as monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques, have been regarded as sacred spaces. Central to this concept lies the idea of sacred space as a site where divinity manifests. For believers, such spaces serve as reminders of God\\\'s greatness and their own sense of belonging and humility. They foster devotion, sub-mission, gratitude, and reverence while also symbolizing purification and renewal. In Islamic belief, al-Masjid al-Haram and al-Masjid an-Nabawi are the two most significant mosques, collectively referred to as al-Masjidayn (the Two Mosques). Together, these two mosques served as spiritual centers shaping Muslim society and supporting the spread of Islam. Al-Masjid al-Haram distinguished Makkah, he Prophet Muhammad’s birthplace and the city where he began his prophetic mission; the Masjid an-Nabawi distingu-ished Medina, where he spent the second half of his mission, led the Muslim community as a head of state, and passed away. The aim of this study is to examine the religious, historical, and social functions, as well as the archi-tectural and symbolic depth of al-Masjid al-Haram and al-Masjid an-Nabawi through a comparative approach, thereby identifying the similari-ties and differences between the two mosques. In line with this objective, a qualitative method has been adopted; through thematic analysis of Islamic historical sources—particularly works on the urban histories of Makkah and Medina—the structural and functional characteristics of both mosques are addressed comparatively. Both the Kaaba and al-Masjid an-Nabawi were initially built as simple, roofless structures with only modest enclosures. Over time, various architectural elements such as roofs, columns, and cano-pies were added to meet the growing needs of the Muslim community. The columns within the Kaaba were originally made of wood and served only to support the roof. It is recorded that the Prophet Muḥammad prayed inside the Kaaba, standing between the two front pillars. However, he did not encourage praying within the Kaaba itself. In contrast, al-Masjid an-Nabawi holds a distinct feature: the Prophet encouraged believers to enter this area. Ultimately, this study argues that even though al-Masjid al-Haram and al-Masjid an-Nabawi differ in terms of architecture and func-tion, they form a complementary whole in the spiritual lives of Muslims. The historical and religious elements of these two mosques provide a sense of unity for believers, fostering a profound connection between them, their Lord, and their Prophet. This article aims to make an original academic contribution to the current literature by examining the architectural and symbolic dimensions of al-Masjid al-Haram and al-Masjid al-Nabawi thro-ugh a comparative approach, focusing on their place, meaning, and value within Islamic civilization.
Keywords : İslâm tarihi, Mescid-i Harâm, Mescid-i Nebevî, Mekân, Makam, Mimari, Sembol

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL