IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
  • Cilt: 51 Sayı: 3
  • Predictive Value of Modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (mEASIX) for Ruxolitinib Respon...

Predictive Value of Modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (mEASIX) for Ruxolitinib Response in Graft-versus-Host Disease

Authors : Fazıl Cagrı Hunutlu, Fahir Özkalemkaş, Hikmet Öztop, İbrahim Ethem Pınar, Vildan Gürsoy, Tuba Ersal, Vildan Ozkocaman
Pages : 529-536
Doi:10.32708/uutfd.1790006
View : 50 | Download : 232
Publication Date : 2025-12-08
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continues to be a predominant cause of non-relapse morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Ruxolitinib is an established second-line treatment for steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent acute and chronic GVHD; however, predictive biomarkers for treatment response are lacking. The modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (mEASIX) is determined by measuring lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and platelet count, and it indicates both endothelial damage and systemic inflammation. In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated the predictive value of mEASIX for ruxolitinib response in 23 adult patients with GVHD. To assess the predictive capability of the mEASIX score, both receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and logistic regression analysis were conducted. The median age was 37 years, and acute myeloid leukemia was the most common indication for transplantation (65.2%). Eleven patients had steroid-refractory/dependent acute GVHD, while 12 had steroid-refractory/dependent chronic GVHD. The overall response rate to ruxolitinib was 65.2%, with the lowest response observed in patients with bronchiolitis obliterans. Patients with ruxolitinib resistance had significantly higher mEASIX scores at treatment initiation compared to responders (37.09 vs. 5.38, p=0.008). Based on the ROC curve analysis optimal mEASIX cut-off value for predicting ruxolitinib resistance was 22.2 (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 86.7%, AUC: 0.842, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, mEASIX remained an independent predictor of ruxolitinib response (OR: 0.051, p=0.008). Patients with high mEASIX scores had lower 1-year overall survival compared to those with low scores (50% vs. 92.3%, p=0.078). Our findings suggest that early evaluation of mEASIX can identify patients at risk of ruxolitinib resistance, allowing timely treatment modifications to improve clinical outcomes in GVHD. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate these results.
Keywords : Allojeneik hematopoetik kök hücre nakli (Allo-kit), Graft-versus-host-hastalığı (GVHH), Modifiye Endotelyal Aktivite ve Stres İndeksi, Ruksolitinib

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026