IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi
  • Volume:48 Issue:3
  • Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation

Comparison of Diode Laser and Conventional Method in Treatment of Gingival Melanin Hyperpigmentation

Authors : Revan Birke KOCAÜNSAL, Gökhan KASNAK, Erhan FİRATLİ
Pages : 95-100
Doi:10.52037/eads.2021.0030
View : 28 | Download : 12
Publication Date : 2021-12-31
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :ABSTRACT Purpose: We aim to compare the scalpel and diode laser methods in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation in terms of postoperative pain and wound healing. Materials & Methods: Sixteen systemically healthy individuals requesting treatment for light or moderate gingival hyperpigmentation were enrolled for this study. The individuals were randomly assigned to treatment with the diode laser method or conventional scalpel method. Dummett oral pigmentation index was recorded at baseline. The VAS form was given to the individuals and postoperative pain and wound healing were compared on the postoperative 7th day. Comparisons between the groups were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test and P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The scalpel group showed total epithelialization, however, the laser group showed incomplete epithelialization. The scalpel group declared significantly higher pain perception in comparison to the laser group on the first and second days after the surgery (p=0,002 and p=0,038, respectively). No significant differences were found between the groups on the fourth and seventh day regarding pain perception (p>0,05). Also, no significant difference was observed in any comparisons between the pain perceptions of female and male individuals (p>0,05). Conclusion: Both scalpel and diode laser are obtained successful clinical results in the treatment of gingival hyperpigmentation. Although increased chair-time and impaired wound healing at one-week follow-up, intraoperative homeostasis and relatively less postoperative pain reveal the superiority of diode laser to the scalpel. The choice of the method may vary depending on the available equipment and preference of the patient and the clinician.
Keywords : diode laser, gingival hyperpigmentation, postoperative pain, scalpel, vas

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025