IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi
  • Volume:43 Issue:2
  • Comparing Some Ideas of Ibn Haldun and John Locke about the Epistemology from Some Aspects

Comparing Some Ideas of Ibn Haldun and John Locke about the Epistemology from Some Aspects

Authors : Hacer ÂŞIK EV
Pages : 89-122
Doi:10.1501/Egifak_0000001204
View : 27 | Download : 13
Publication Date : 2010-10-01
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :In this article some opinions of Ibn Haldun who lived at the end of the Middle Age and some opinions of John Locke who lived in the New Age about epistemology were tried to be compared from some aspects. For both thinkers, who have rejected the innatism and accepted the mind as a blank slate at first, the source of knowledge is senses and thought. According to Ibn Haldun, the knowledge’s subject is universals, and according to Locke, the knowledge’s subject is ideas and the relations between ideas. Ibn Haldun asserted that the perceptions about concretes are more reliable and far from fault than abstracts. Locke accepted that the intuitive knowledge is the most evident and reliable knowledge
Keywords : İbn Haldun, John Locke, epistemoloji, bilgi

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025