IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International
  • Volume:10 Issue:1
  • Interactional Metadiscourse in Research Articles Written by Turkish and Native Speakers

Interactional Metadiscourse in Research Articles Written by Turkish and Native Speakers

Authors : Meral ÇAPAR, Ümit Deniz TURAN
Pages : 324-358
Doi:10.18039/ajesi.682042
View : 16 | Download : 10
Publication Date : 2020-01-31
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :This study investigates how Turkish non-native speakers and native speakers of English use metadiscourse markers in research articles. With this purpose, a total of 100 research articles on the field of teaching a foreign language were analyzed based on the taxonomy of Hyland and Tse insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(2004);. 50 research articles written by Turkish academic writers and 50 research articles written by American academic writers were collected from prestigious journals. The taxonomy has mainly two components: Interactive and interactional resources. This study focuses on the interactional resources. A qualitative approach was applied. The results of the binomial test showed that there are significant differences in the use of interactional metadiscourse markers between the two groups. American academic writers insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(AAWs); used significantly more interactional metadiscourse markers insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(IMMs); in English research articles insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ERAs); compared to Turkish academic writers insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(TAWs);. The use of the subcategories of engagement markers were also significantly different specifically in terms of the use of self-mention and questions. This may suggest that the use of IMMs may show cultural preferences, which can be considered as stylistic difference and may not need further instructional intervention. Thus, academic writing courses are suggested to be included especially in MA and PhD programs. Models of academic texts can be used in courses and raising consciousness on both micro and macro aspects of academic discourse can be suggested.
Keywords : Academic writing, research articles, interactional metadiscourse markers, EFL writing

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025