IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Cukurova Medical Journal
  • Cilt: 50 Sayı: 4
  • Comparison of colistin MIC values of multidrug-resistant acinetobacter baumannii complex strains iso...

Comparison of colistin MIC values of multidrug-resistant acinetobacter baumannii complex strains isolated from various clinical samples by automatic system and microdilution method

Authors : Funda Şahin, Sadık Akgün, Gülnur Tarhan
Pages : 1035-1043
Doi:10.17826/cumj.1717609
View : 90 | Download : 295
Publication Date : 2025-12-22
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Purpose: Acinetobacter baumannii has become a major nosocomial pathogen, with increasing resistance rates are making many antibiotics ineffective. Colistin remains one of the few therapeutic options for multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains; however, reliable susceptibility testing is essential. The “Broth Microdilution (BMD)” method is currently the only accepted reference standard, but its labor-intensive nature limits its routine use. Automated systems such as BD Phoenix™100 (Becton Dickinson, USA) are widely implemented, but their accuracy in colistin testing remains under scrutiny. Material and Methods: A total of 1000 MDR A. baumannii complex strains isolated from clinical samples were analyzed. Colistin susceptibility was assessed simultaneously with both the BD Phoenix™100 and BMD methods. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (colistin sensitive) and E. coli NCTC 13846 (colistin resistant, mcr-1 positive) strains were used as quality controls. Breakpoints were interpreted according to EUCAST version 11.0 (MIC ≤ 2 μg/ml = susceptible; >2 μg/ml = resistant). Results: Colistin resistance rates among 1000 isolates examined were found to be 64 (6.4%) and 131 (13.1%) for the BD Phoenix™100 and BMD methods, respectively. According to comparative statistical analysis, categorical agreement (CA) was 97.2%, major error (ME) rate was 6.2% and very major error (VME) rate was 13.9%.MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ values were found to be 1 μg/ml and 2 μg/ml and 0.5 μg/ml and 2 μg/ml for the BD Phoenix™100 and BMD assay, respectively. Conclusion: Commercial automated systems lack high sensitivity for detecting colistin resistance. Therefore, standardization and validation studies are essential. On the other hand, while the BMD test is considered a reference method, it is impractical and time-consuming for routine use. It can be used for confirmation purposes when automated systems fail to yield results.
Keywords : Acinetobacter baumannii, Antimikrobiyal duyarlılık, kolistin, sıvı mikrodilüsyon

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026