Comparison of Passing Scores Determined by The Angoff Method in Different Item Samples

In this study, the efficiency of various random sampling methods to reduce the number of items rated by judges in an Angoff standard-setting study was examined and the methods were compared with each other. Firstly, the full-length test was formed by combining Placement Test 2012 and 2013 mathematics subsets. After then, simple random sampling insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(SRS);, content stratified insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(C-SRS);, item-difficulty stratified insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(D-SRS); and content-by-difficulty random sampling insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(CD-SRS); methods were used to constitute different length of subsets insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(30%, 40%, 50%, 70%); from the full-test. In total, 16 different study conditions insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(4 methods x 4 subsets); were investigated. In data analysis part, ANOVA analysis was conducted to examine whether minimum passing scores insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(MPSs); for the subsets were significantly different from the MPSs of the full-length test. As a follow-up analysis, RMSE and SEE insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Standard Error of Estimation); values were calculated for each study condition. Results indicated that the estimated Angoff MPSs were significantly different from the full-test Angoff MPS insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(45.12); only in the study conditions of 30%-C-SRS, 40% C-SRS, 30% D-SRS and 30%-CD-SRS. According to RMSE values, the C-SRS method had the smallest error while the SRS method had the biggest one. Moreover, SEE examinations revealed that to achieve estimations similar to the full-test Angoff MPS insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(within one SEE);, it is sufficient to get 50% of items with the C-SRS method. C-SRS method was the more effective one compared to the others in reducing the number of items rated by judges in MPS setting studies conducted with the Angoff method.