IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • International Journal of Educational Research Review
  • Volume:2 Issue:2
  • Analysis of 2014 Post UTME Score of Candidates in the University of Ibadan with Two Methods of Stand...

Analysis of 2014 Post UTME Score of Candidates in the University of Ibadan with Two Methods of Standard Setting to Set Cut Off Points

Authors : Babatunde OLADELE
Pages : 44-51
Doi:10.24331/ijere.328451
View : 17 | Download : 6
Publication Date : 2017-07-01
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :The aim of the current study is to analyse the 2014 Post UTME scores of candidates in the university of Ibadan towards the establishment of cut off using two methods of standard settings. Prospective candidates who seek admission to higher institution are often denied admission through the Post UTME exercise. There is no single recommended approach to standard setting and many methods exist. These include norm-referenced methods and the criterion- referenced methods. The Angoff method is the most widely used and researched criterion-referenced method of standard setting. Two different methods of standard setting were applied on the raw scores of 648 Post-UTME candidates in the University of Ibadan. One of these was the modified Angoff method and the other the norm-reference method of standard setting insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(mean minus 1 SD);. The pass rates derived from the two methods were compared. The result revealed the pass rate with the norm-reference method was 85% insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(551/648); and that by the Angoff method was 50% insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(340/648);. The percentage agreement between Angoff method and norm-reference was found to be 54% with the Angolf modified method, whilst by the norm-reference method was 85%. Thus, the two standard-setting methods used, produced significantly different outcomes. This was demonstrated by the different pass rates.
Keywords : Cut Off Point, Post UTME, Standard

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025