IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research
  • Volume:8 Issue:3
  • Comparision of Perioperative Fluoropyrimidine, Docetaxel And Oxaliplatin Regimen with Adjuvant Fluor...

Comparision of Perioperative Fluoropyrimidine, Docetaxel And Oxaliplatin Regimen with Adjuvant Fluoropyrimidine and Oxaliplatine Regimen In Operable Gastric Cancer Patients

Authors : Aslı Yıldırım, Zeynep Ergenç, Nihal Bozdağ Kaplan, Hasan Ergenç
Pages : 248-256
Doi:10.34084/bshr.1591847
View : 32 | Download : 65
Publication Date : 2024-12-31
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Aim: As no study has compared perioperative 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy regimens with postoperative adjuvant oral capecitabine and oxaliplatin/5-FU and oxaliplatin (CAPEOX/FOLFOX) chemotherapy regimens, the goal of this study was to compare them in terms of median and overall survival of operable gastric cancers. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study recruited 59 subjects (17 females and 42 males) with at least T2 or more invasive gastric cancers with or without positive lymph node(s). All the patients underwent total or subtotal ((sub) total) gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) 26.0 program was used to statistically analyze the research findings. Results: The peri-operative FLOT treatment group with 30 patients displayed significantly more advanced clinical nodal (cN) stage (p<0.005), more comorbidities (p=0.025), and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance (p=0.007) during diagnosis than the adjuvant CAPEOX/FOLFOX treatment group (29 patients). The median overall survival (mOS) and median progression free survival (mPFS) were found to be statistically significant (21 vs. 14 months, p=0.018 and 17 versus 8.5 months p=0.009, respectively) higher in favor of the adjuvant treatment group. Conclusion: According to real-life data, younger and earlier stage patients who chose surgery as the first treatment option to eliminate cancer as soon as possible had longer mOS and mPFS.
Keywords : Gastrik, kanser, neoadjuvan, adjuvan, tedavi.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025