Distribution of Implant Failure Caused by Positioning in a Group of Turkish Patients on CBCT

Authors : Hilal Peker ÖZTÜRK, Hakan AVSEVER, Aslıhan ASLAN BALCI, Hatice Seda ÖZGEDİK, Buğra ŞENEL, Merdan ALLABERDİYEV

Pages : 805-814

Doi:10.30621/jbachs.1032929

View : 25 | Download : 13

Publication Date : 2022-09-29

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :Purpose: The aim of this report was to evaluate the prevalence of implant failure rates due to implant positioning on Cone beam Computerized Tomography. Methods: Study sample insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(n= 333); consisted of CBCTinsert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Cone-beam computerized tomography); scans of patients who were referred to the Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Gülhane Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey. Obtained data such as age, gender, number of implants and locations from CBCT images gathered and recorded. Results: The data consists of 333 patients and so the total data evaluated was 844. The implant survival rate of the patients between 20-40 years old insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(49.4%); was lower significantly than that of the patients ≥ 40 years old insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(P=0.001);. In the R4 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(right mandibular region);, implant failure rate is 17.5% shows quite low rate compared to other regions. At the R1 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(right maxillar region); insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(39%); and R2 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(45%); the most common reason of failure was maxillary sinus perforation, the least common reason was palatinal bone perforation, respectively 4% and 1%. Conclusion: Preventing misinterpretations of clinicians is only possible by correct evaluation of incidental findings and better knowledge of head and neck anatomy.
Keywords : Cbct, implant failure, incidentally findings