IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine
  • Volume:6 Issue:2
  • Functional outcomes of periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a comparative s...

Functional outcomes of periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a comparative study

Authors : Yılmaz ERGİŞİ, Mesut TIKMAN, Selçuk KORKMAZER, Halil KEKEÇ, Erdi ÖZDEMİR, Muhammed Nadir YALÇIN
Pages : 476-480
Doi:10.32322/jhsm.1231671
View : 22 | Download : 8
Publication Date : 2023-03-27
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of locked plating in closed distal femur periprosthetic, and non-periprosthetic fractures. We hypothesized that the outcomes would be superior in the non-periprosthetic distal femur fracture group. Material and Method: Patients who underwent surgery for distal femur fractures between January 2019 and January 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients aged under 18 years, who had multiple fractures, pathological fractures, follow-up less than 6 months, previous history of revision knee arthroplasty, interprosthetic fractures between hip and knee arthroplasties, fixation performed other than distal locking femoral plate and intra-operative periprosthetic fractures were excluded. Patients’ age, gender, laterality, length of hospital stay, and follow-up duration were obtained from hospital registry notes. Fractures were classified using the AO classification system. At the last follow-up, visual analogue scale insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(VAS);, Tegner activity score, Lysholm knee score, and short form 36 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(SF-36); scores were noted. Results: A total of 30 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. There were 14 patients in the non-periprosthetic fracture group and 16 patients in the periprosthetic fracture group. The periprosthetic group had significantly lower mean VAS score insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p=0.047);, Tegner activity score insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p=0.015);, and Lysholm knee score insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p=0.034); than the non-periprosthetic group. The periprosthetic fracture group had significantly inferior quality of life scores compared to non-periprosthetic groups based on SF-36 sub-parameters. Conclusion: Periprosthetic distal femoral fractures have inferior clinical outcomes and quality of life than non-periprosthetic fractures despite having similar fracture healing rate. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the frailty of the patients caused by prior total knee arthroplasty surgery.
Keywords : Distal femur fracture, Periprosthetic fracture, Total knee arthroplasty, Locking plate fixation, nonunion

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025