The effect of different chelating agents on the push-out bond strength of proroot mta and endosequence root repair material

Authors : Burak Buldur, Fatih Öznurhan, Arife Kaptan

Pages : 88-93

Doi:10.26650/eor.20191618

View : 24 | Download : 9

Publication Date : 2019-05-31

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(EDTA);, 7% maleic acid insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(MA);, and 10% citric acid insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(CA); on the push-out bond strength of ProRooT MTA and Endosequence Root Repair Material insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ERRM); putty. Materials and Methods Eighty single-rooted extracted human teeth were instrumented to obtain a standardized immature teeth model. Based on the chelating agents tested, the specimens were randomly divided into three experimental groups: Group 1 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(17% EDTA);, Group 2 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(7% MA);, Group 3 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(10% CA);, and Group 4 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Positive Control); insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(n=20 for each group);. Each group was further classified into two subgroups: Group A insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ProRoot MTA); and Group B insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Endosequence Root Repair Material insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ERRM); putty); insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(n=10 for each subgroup);. After irrigation and placement of cements, teeth were stored at 37°C and in 100% humidity for a week. A total of 240 dentine discs insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(three discs per teeth); were obtained and subjected to push-out assay. Data was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc t-test. Results Both types of chelating agent and calcium silicate-based cement were significantly associated with the push-out bond strength values. The push-out bond strength was significantly less for CA as compared to EDTA or MA. ERRM had higher bond strength values than ProRoot MTA insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p<0.05);. Conclusion The use of chelating agents increased the push-out bond strength of CSC. Regardless of tested chelating agents, ERRM had higher bond strength values than ProRoot MTA.
Keywords : Calcium silicate based cement, cheating agent, Endosequence Root Repair Material, push out bond strength