IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Karya Journal of Health Science
  • Volume:5 Issue:3
  • COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND KINESIOPHOBIA LEVELS AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTR...

COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND KINESIOPHOBIA LEVELS AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFT VERSUS FRESH-FROZEN ALLOGRAFT: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Authors : Sefa Eldemir, Zekeriya Öztemür
Pages : 82-87
Doi:10.52831/kjhs.1459231
View : 62 | Download : 86
Publication Date : 2024-12-30
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Objective: Determining the best graft in the selection of various graft types for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is still unclear. The study aimed to compare the functional outcomes and kinesiophobia among individuals who underwent ACLR with either hamstring tendon autograft or fresh-frozen allografts and healthy individuals. Method: A total of 44 individuals undergoing ACLR and 30 healthy individuals were assessed. Individuals who underwent ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft (Group 1) or fresh-frozen allograft (Group 2) and a control group with similar activity levels (Group 3) were included in this study. The surgical groups were evaluated 12-48 months after surgery. Evaluations included detailed history, knee muscle strength, single-leg hop test, and kinesiophobia. Results: There were 24 individuals (mean age 31.71±9.78 years) in Group 1, 20 individuals (mean age 32.35±5.58 years) in Group 2, and 30 healthy controls (mean age 33.77±7.09 years) in Group 3. There was no difference between the surgical groups in terms of single-leg hop test, kinesiophobia, and muscle strength (p>0.05). However, there were significant differences between the ACLR groups with the control group in terms of muscle strength of injured side (p<0.002), single-leg hop test (p<0.029), and kinesiophobia level (p=0.005). Conclusion: This study showed that no graft type was superior to another in terms of functional outcomes and kinesiophobia after ACLR. In addition, the need for long-term rehabilitation of individuals with ACLR should be taken into consideration to reach their pre-operative functional level.
Keywords : Allografts, Autografts, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Kinesiophobia, Functional Performance

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025