IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Marmara Medical Journal
  • Volume:10 Issue:4
  • A comparison of propofol, alfentanil and midazolam for sedation during spinal anesthesia

A comparison of propofol, alfentanil and midazolam for sedation during spinal anesthesia

Authors : T Umuroğlu, Z Eti, FY Gögüş
Pages : 198-202
View : 31 | Download : 11
Publication Date : 1997-10-01
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy and side effects of propofol, midazolam and alfentanil used for sedation during spinal anesthesia. Methods: Thirty patients aged. 20-70 years, scheduled for inguinal hernia repair, appendectomy or transurethral resection were randomly assigned to three groups insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(n=10);. The patients were given 1.25 mg/kg propofol i.v. in group I, 1.8 |ig/kg alfentanil i.v. in group II and 0.1 mg/kg midazolam i.v. in group III prior performing spinal anesthesia. For maintenance of sedation propofol infusion of 3 mg/kg/h in group I,alfentanil infusion of 40 Jlg/kg/h in group II and midazolam infusion of 0.1 mg/kg/h in group III were started. The infusion rates were adjusted to maintain an appropriate sedation level. In all patients mean arterial pressure insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(MAP);, heart rate insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(HR);, oxygen saturation insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Sp02);, end tidal carbondioxide insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ETC02); and respiratory rate insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(RR); were recorded. Results: In propofol group; while MAP and HR decreased significantly after bolus dose, the sedation level 2 was achieved within 5 minutes insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p<0.05);. In alfentanil group; while HR, MAP and RR decreased and ETC02 increased significantly insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p<0.05);, the desired sedation level was not achieved. In midazolam group; the sedation level 2 was achieved at 15th minute and MAP, Sp02, HR and RR decreased significantly insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p<0.05);. Conclusion: We conclude that propofol is the most appropriate agent for sedation during spinal anesthesia.
Keywords : Anesthetics, intravenous, propofol, Hypnotics, benzodiazepines, midazolam, Analgesics, alfentanil, Anesthetic techniques, sedation, spinal

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025