IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Selcuk Dental Journal
  • Volume:9 Issue:1
  • Implant-Associated Giant Cell Granuloma: A Case Report of 4.8-Year Follow-up and Literature Review.

Implant-Associated Giant Cell Granuloma: A Case Report of 4.8-Year Follow-up and Literature Review.

Authors : Mehmet Akif ESKAN
Pages : 231-235
Doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1018942
View : 14 | Download : 7
Publication Date : 2022-04-27
Article Type : Other Papers
Abstract :Objective. The aim of this case report was to document a case of implant associated central giant cell granuloma insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(CGCG); and review the literature on implant associated and intrabony lesions. CGCG is most common in females and usually seen in the mandible from anterior to posterior. Based on its clinical, radiological, and histological findings, it can be classified as aggressive and non-aggressive forms. Trauma is considered a major etiological factor for the lesion. Even peripheral giant cell granuloma has been shown as a peri-implant lesion, CGCG has not been reported as an implant-associated pathology. In this case report, we reported that CGCG developed after implant placement in 8 months. 39-year-old female patient with partial edentulism in the posterior mandible presented to our clinic. She had reported that she lost her posterior mandible teeth for more than six years. Initial clinical and radiological examination revealed that she showed localized slight to moderate chronic periodontitis, horizontal ridge deficiency insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(in the posterior mandible);, and cavities. A total of six implants were placed at the same time. At 8-month of the surgery, she showed a radiolucency area #34 area. The lesion was enucleated, and the defect area was filled up with a xenogeneic bone substitute. The healing was uneventful. The histological examination determined the lesion was CGCG. The lesion showed no recurrency for 4.8 years.
Keywords : Central giant cell granuloma, mandible, giant cell lesions, dental implants, guided bone regeneration

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025