IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Selcuk Dental Journal
  • Volume:11 Issue:3
  • The Influence of Adhesive Systems on Microshear Bond Strength in Bur or Laser-Prepared Enamel

The Influence of Adhesive Systems on Microshear Bond Strength in Bur or Laser-Prepared Enamel

Authors : Ece Meral, Meltem Nermin Polan, Alperen Oz, Esra Ergin
Pages : 269-276
Doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1409751
View : 20 | Download : 28
Publication Date : 2024-12-23
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Background: The aim of this study was to assess the microshear bond strength(μSBS) of various adhesive systems on enamel surfaces prepared using either an Er, Cr:YSGG laser or a conventional diamond bur. Methods: Twenty-eight caries-free human molars were longitudinally sectioned, resulting in 56 samples. Buccal or lingual surfaces were embedded in acrylic blocks. Enamel surfaces were prepared using either an Er, Cr: YSGG laser (Biolase Technologies, USA) or a traditional diamond bur (Diatech, Switzerland), referencing the midline of each tooth. Laser treatment was applied to the left side, while the right half underwent bur treatment. The samples were randomly separated into four groups(n=14): [G1] Optibond FL (Kerr, USA), a three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive; [G2] Clearfil SE Bond(Kuraray,Japan), a two-step self-etch adhesive; [G3]Prime&Bond Universal(Dentsply,USA),universal-adhesive/etch-and-rinse-mode; and [G4]Prime&Bond Universal(Dentsply,USA),universal-adhesive/self-etch-mode. Composite cylinders with a diameter of 0.8 mm (Harmonize, Kerr, USA) were affixed to the center of both the laser-prepared and bur-prepared regions of all specimens. The adhesive interface of one randomly chosen representative from each group was analyzed using a Scanning Electron Microscope(SEM). The remaining samples were subjected to μSBS testing. Data were analyzed statistically using Two-Way ANOVA(p 0.05). Regardless of the preparation modalities, the adhesive systems did not exhibit any statistically significant differences(p>0.05). Furthermore, the correlation between various adhesive systems and preparation techniques did not result in statistically significant variations in μSBS values(p>0.05). Conclusion: The measured μSBS values of the adhesive systems examined on enamel surfaces prepared using either an Er, Cr:YSGG laser or a diamond bur showed similarity. Keywords: Laser preparation, Microshear bond strength, Scanning electron microscopy, Universal adhesive.
Keywords : Lazer Preparasyonu, Mikro Kesme Bağlanma Dayanıklılığı, Taramalı Elektron Mikroskobu, Üniversal Adeziv

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025