IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Selcuk Dental Journal
  • Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1
  • Complication Rates and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Complication Rates and Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of Implant-Supported Prostheses

Authors : Nuran Yanıkoglu, Derya Aslan, Merve Köseoğlu
Pages : 42-47
Doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.1456288
View : 36 | Download : 53
Publication Date : 2025-04-21
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Background: The aim of the study was to assess implant and prosthetic failure rates and patients’ evaluations following 2-year observation. Methods: The study was conducted among 110 patients (60 male, 50 female). During recall visits during the first and second year of prosthesis insertion, researchers conducted the clinical examination. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the patient’s satisfaction with the prostheses\\\'. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, Chi-Square, Mann-Witney, and Kruskal-Wallis analysis (α<0.05). Results: In the maxilla and the mandible, the most commonly used prosthesis was cement-retained fixed partial dentures (31.4% and 29.6%, respectively), while the least common procedures were full arch screw retained attachments (2.9% and 3.5%, respectively). The most commonly used material was metal-ceramic (64.2%). Survival rates of implants were similar in the maxilla (94.7%) and the mandible (95.2%) (P=0.544). Prosthesis survival rates were also similar (P=0.094): 76.2% were in the maxilla, and 78.3% were in the mandible. The highest technical and mechanical complication rates were observed in partial fixed denture prostheses inserted in the maxilla and the mandible (26.8% and 25.6%, respectively). In the maxilla and mandible, the most frequent complication was ceramic chipping (16.2% and 15.6%, respectively), followed by occlusal screw loosening (3.8% and 2.6%, respectively). Patients’ satisfaction rates ranged between 91%-95% in terms of function, aesthetics, and convenience. Conclusion: After a use time of 2 years, high survival rates and patient satisfaction ratings were obtained. There was no significant difference in implant failures, while prosthetic failures were higher in fixed partial dentures. Keywords: Dental implants, dentist, mandible, maxilla
Keywords : Dental implant, diş hekimi, maksilla, mandibula

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2026