IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • The European Research Journal
  • Volume:5 Issue:3
  • How does occupational radiation exposure affect corneal endothelial cell density?

How does occupational radiation exposure affect corneal endothelial cell density?

Authors : Mehmet Erol CAN
Pages : 479-483
Doi:10.18621/eurj.509803
View : 16 | Download : 10
Publication Date : 2019-05-04
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Objectives: To evalute the corneal endothelium ofradiology technicians . Methods: The study included 35 radiology technicians insert ignore into journalissuearticles values( study group );, and 34 healthy individuals as the control group. Central corneal thickness insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(CCT);, Endothelial cell density insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ECD);, the coefficient of variation insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(CoV);, and the percentage of hexagonal cells insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Hexa); were measured using specular microscopy insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Konan Medical Inc., Nishinomiya, Japan); . Results: The mean age of the study participants was 35.82 ± 9.34 years in the study group, and 37.82 ± 8.40 years in the control group insert ignore into journalissuearticles values( p = 0.332);. The mean ECD was 2740.63 ± 249.92 cells/mm 2 in the study group, and 2828.70 ± 287.40 in the control group insert ignore into journalissuearticles values( p > 0.05);. The mean CoV was 44.34 ± 6.78 % in the study group, and 44.24 ± 4.99 % in the control group insert ignore into journalissuearticles values( p > 0.05);. Hexa was determined as 44.97 ± 7.98% in the study group, and 45.97 ± 7.06% in the control group insert ignore into journalissuearticles values( p > 0.05);. The mean CCT was 511.50 ± 42.52 in the study group, and 514.18 ± 43.55 in the control group insert ignore into journalissuearticles values( p > 0.05);. The mean ECD, CoV, Hexa, and CCTvalues were not statistically significant insert ignore into journalissuearticles values( p > 0.05);. Conclusion: This study revealed that endothelial cell density, the coefficient of variation, and percentage of hexagonal cells insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(Hexa); were not statistically different between the radiology technicians and control group. Nevertheless, there is a need for more comprehensive, controlled studies with larger samples. 
Keywords : Radiology technicians, endothelial cell density, specular microscope, occupational radiation

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025