J'ed no clinical signs. 6· At the contrals done by pulling of fleece 10cally, at the sixth day of the dosing of animals, the skin was found completely bare underneath. For this reason to remove the fleece it was waited ti11 to 2] st. days, as the literature stated A:fter that time all the fleece were Temoved from the animals. Animals body came out with short, unuorm newgrowth hair. 7. The fleece could not be removed from the six of the 28 animals. İn the animals the time spent for removing was 'different amQng animals. İnspite of this fact the averag~ time spent for chemical shearing was shorter 'than the mechanical shearing. It was conc1uded that 30 mg. drug for per kilogram body is necessary t9 eliıninate this variance which might come from the indidividual. 8, At the comparison of the fleece obtained fro~ both groups, the average weight of fleece was greater in the drug administred _group than the mechanically shom group. Because therc was not any shearing loss. in the former. 9. General1y it can be stated that the method of chemical shearing could ve replaced widely the mechanical sheaöng in the very future. Bu it would be necessary that: a. The drug must be prepared so in a form that the animal raiser can dose it easely, b. The cost of the drug apHed per animaİ must be cheaper than the cost of mechanical shearing, c. And much research must be done on the side ~ffects of the drug to be sure that it is not harmfull to anima1s and also to human health at alL."> J'ed no clinical signs. 6· At the contrals done by pulling of fleece 10cally, at the sixth day of the dosing of animals, the skin was found completely bare underneath. For this reason to remove the fleece it was waited ti11 to 2] st. days, as the literature stated A:fter that time all the fleece were Temoved from the animals. Animals body came out with short, unuorm newgrowth hair. 7. The fleece could not be removed from the six of the 28 animals. İn the animals the time spent for removing was 'different amQng animals. İnspite of this fact the averag~ time spent for chemical shearing was shorter 'than the mechanical shearing. It was conc1uded that 30 mg. drug for per kilogram body is necessary t9 eliıninate this variance which might come from the indidividual. 8, At the comparison of the fleece obtained fro~ both groups, the average weight of fleece was greater in the drug administred _group than the mechanically shom group. Because therc was not any shearing loss. in the former. 9. General1y it can be stated that the method of chemical shearing could ve replaced widely the mechanical sheaöng in the very future. Bu it would be necessary that: a. The drug must be prepared so in a form that the animal raiser can dose it easely, b. The cost of the drug apHed per animaİ must be cheaper than the cost of mechanical shearing, c. And much research must be done on the side ~ffects of the drug to be sure that it is not harmfull to anima1s and also to human health at alL." > KOYUNLARIN İLAÇLI KIRKIMLARI VE BU AMAÇLA MERİNOSLAR ÜZERİNDE YAPILMIŞ OLAN BİR CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE UYGULAMASI

KOYUNLARIN İLAÇLI KIRKIMLARI VE BU AMAÇLA MERİNOSLAR ÜZERİNDE YAPILMIŞ OLAN BİR CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE UYGULAMASI

Authors : İhsan AYSAN
Pages : 0-0
View : 30 | Download : 9
Publication Date : 2010-12-15
Article Type : Other Papers
Abstract :ÖZET Bir yaşındaki erkek Merinoslar üzerinde, ilaçlı kırkımdaki etkisini kontrol etmek amacı ile Cyclophosphamide uygulaması yapılmıştır. ilacın etki zamanı ile yapağı verimi ve yapağının yolunup alınabilmesi için gerekli olan zaman, kontrol gurubu ile karşılaştırmalı olarak, incelenmiş ve bulunmuş olan sonuçların bu konudaki literatür ile uyarlılık' halinde oldukları görülmüştür. CHEMICAL SHEARING OF SHEEP AND A CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE APPLICATION ON MERlNO RAMS 1". İn this investigation the Cyc1ophosphamide was used to sheare the .Merino Rams under Erzurum conditions. 2. 56 Merino Rams, one year old, were used in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups. One of the groups was used for the drug administration, and the other one was kept as a control group and sheared mechanka1ly at the same time with the former. 3. Both of the groups were kept 'under similar conditions ~md they were never shorn before. 4. A 4 % solution of CyCıophosphamide was given to animals orally, on the basis of 25 mg./kg. boCıy weight. The experiİnetal animals were no treated spesifically before the administration of the drug. 5. Up to sixth day, after the administration of th~ drug, animals shO'\>J'ed no clinical signs. 6· At the contrals done by pulling of fleece 10cally, at the sixth day of the dosing of animals, the skin was found completely bare underneath. For this reason to remove the fleece it was waited ti11 to 2] st. days, as the literature stated A:fter that time all the fleece were Temoved from the animals. Animals body came out with short, unuorm newgrowth hair. 7. The fleece could not be removed from the six of the 28 animals. İn the animals the time spent for removing was 'different amQng animals. İnspite of this fact the averag~ time spent for chemical shearing was shorter 'than the mechanical shearing. It was conc1uded that 30 mg. drug for per kilogram body is necessary t9 eliıninate this variance which might come from the indidividual. 8, At the comparison of the fleece obtained fro~ both groups, the average weight of fleece was greater in the drug administred _group than the mechanically shom group. Because therc was not any shearing loss. in the former. 9. General1y it can be stated that the method of chemical shearing could ve replaced widely the mechanical sheaöng in the very future. Bu it would be necessary that: a. The drug must be prepared so in a form that the animal raiser can dose it easely, b. The cost of the drug apHed per animaİ must be cheaper than the cost of mechanical shearing, c. And much research must be done on the side ~ffects of the drug to be sure that it is not harmfull to anima1s and also to human health at alL.
Keywords :

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL