- Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
- Volume:4 Issue:3
- Effects of high intensity deadlift on standing long jump ability
Effects of high intensity deadlift on standing long jump ability
Authors : Teag WHİTİNG, Alan BİSHOP, Chad HARRİS, Joseph BERNİNG, Kent J ADAMS, Mark DEBELİSO
Pages : 73-81
Doi:10.31459/turkjkin.439874
View : 22 | Download : 12
Publication Date : 2018-09-20
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Post activation potentiation insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(PAP); is an acute enhancement of muscular function subsequent to an intense muscle conditioning activity. Practical application of PAP as a physical preparation for enhanced performance is a topic of considerable interest in the sport performance community. The purpose of this study was to determine if a dynamic warm-up insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(WU); plus a progression of deadlift insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(DL); sets culminating in a one-repetition maximum DL insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(1-RM DL); insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(i.e., a PAP conditioning activity); is more effective in improving the standing long jump insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(SLJ); as opposed to using a dynamic WU alone. Secondarily, it was of interest to determine if there was a meaningful relationship between the 1-RM DL and SLJ ability. Twenty NCAA Division I male North American football players participated in the study insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(age=20.3±2.3 years, height=183.5±6.3 cm, mass=96.3±17.1 kg);. Participants met three times separated by one week. The initial gathering was an orientation meeting where participants were briefed on the study protocol and height, age and body mass were recorded. During the first data collection the participants completed a dynamic WU immediately followed by a progression of DLs culminating in a 1-RM DL; this served as a PAP conditioning activity. Following the PAP WU insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(5-6 minutes); the participants completed two trials of SLJs separated by 2-3 minutes. During the second data collection the participants completed the dynamic WU only followed insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(5-6 minutes); by the participants completing two trials of SLJs separated by 2-3 minutes. A paired t-test was used to compare the maximum SLJ between WU conditions and a Pearson correlation coefficient insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(r); was calculated to compare 1-RM DLs with SLJ scores. The SLJ was significantly greater insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(4.3±7.5 cm); following the 1-RM DL PAP warm-up insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p<0.01);. The relationship between the 1-RM DL and SLJ scores was r=0.53 insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p<0.01); with a coefficient of determination of CD=0.28. Within the parameters of this study, a dynamic WU that included a 1-RM DL as a PAP conditioning activity significantly improved SLJ performance over a dynamic WU alone. Further, there is a moderate positive relationship between maximum DL performance and SLJ ability.Keywords : NCAA football, post activation potentiation, standing broad jump