IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
  • Volume:14 Issue:4 - Cumhuriyet'in 100. Yılına Armağan Sayısı
  • The Comparison of The Online and Face-to-Face Assessments of Physical Functions in Healthy Adults

The Comparison of The Online and Face-to-Face Assessments of Physical Functions in Healthy Adults

Authors : S Tuğba TOPLUOĞLU, Çiğdem YAZICIMUTLU
Pages : 709-715
Doi:10.31067/acusaglik.1296804
View : 51 | Download : 61
Publication Date : 2023-10-01
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Purpose: This study aims to investigate whether online assessments can be used as an alternative way to face-to-face assessments. Method: The study included 20 volunteer healthy adults insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(F/M: 14/6; Age: 59.1 ± 8.02 years-old); without any neurological problems and scored 24 or higher in the Mini-Mental State Examination Test. All assessments insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(The Timed Up and Go Test insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(TUG);, Berg Balance Scale insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(BBS);, Five Times Sit to Stand Test insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(FTSTS);, Arm Curl Test insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(ACT); and Toe Touch Tests insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(TTT);); were performed both online and face-to-face. Google Meet or Zoom Meetings platforms were used for online assessments. Differences between online and face-to-face groups were determined by the Wilcoxon test. Results: In the study, there was no statistically significant differences between the online and face-to-face assessments of the TUG insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p=0.057);, BBS insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p= 0.546); and TTT insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p=0.438);. However, it was significant differences the online FTSTS insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p=0.028); and ACT insert ignore into journalissuearticles values(p= 0.002); tests with compared to face-to-face evaluation. The current study has shown that can be performed to adults of the assessments of TUG, BBS and TTT tests on the supervised online platform.
Keywords : Online Assessments, Face to Face Assessments, Physiotherapy, Healthy Adults, Physical Functions

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025