IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Dergisi
  • Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4
  • Mechanical and microstructural properties of stone units in the masonry building stock of Urla penin...

Mechanical and microstructural properties of stone units in the masonry building stock of Urla peninsula

Authors : Uğur Demir
Pages : 963-969
Doi:10.24012/dumf.1537224
View : 46 | Download : 101
Publication Date : 2024-12-23
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :This experimental study focuses on two most commonly used stone types in masonry building stock on the Urla Peninsula of İzmir: sandstone and limestone. The compressive behavior of these stones, which is critical to the structural integrity of historic and contemporary stone masonry buildings in the region, was analyzed in detail. To assess their mechanical performance under compressive stress, uniaxial compressive loads were applied to the stone samples, which were gathered after an extensive field survey. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analyses were leveraged to characterize their microstructure. SEM analysis provided detailed insights into the surface morphology and microstructural composition of the stones, revealing differences in grain size and bonding. BET analysis was used to determine the specific surface area and pore size distribution, which are key factors influencing the stones\\\' mechanical strength and durability. The results demonstrated that limestone exhibits significantly superior mechanical properties under compressive stress compared to sandstone. Specifically, the denser and more homogeneous microstructure of limestone, characterized by smaller pores and fewer micro-cracks, contributes to its higher compressive strength. This was corroborated by BET analysis, which showed that limestone has a larger surface area and less porous structure, enhancing its load-bearing capacity. In contrast, sandstone, with its relatively higher porosity, displayed lower resistance to compressive forces, making it more susceptible to deformation and failure under axial loads. The study underscores the importance of microstructural characteristics in determining the mechanical performance of natural building materials.
Keywords : BET, kireçtaşı, kumtaşı, SEM

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025