A Comparison of Interior Aesthetic Pleasure: Differences Between Interior Architecture First-Year and Upper-Year Students

Authors : Zeyca Örer Söğüt, Guler Ufuk Demırbas

Pages : 276-297

Doi:10.37246/grid.1396769

View : 95 | Download : 41

Publication Date : 2024-04-19

Article Type : Research Paper

Abstract :The professions of interior architecture necessitate the integration of both aesthetics and functionality. Therefore, these concepts are deeply embedded in the university education process. The first step on this educational path is taking the basic design studio course which aims students to start developing critical and abstract thinking skills in the design process. It would contribute to the literature to examine how far students are able to develop their aesthetic evaluations in the first year of university education. Therefore, we conducted the study to investigate if there is a difference in aesthetic evaluations of interiors between students who have just started their interior architecture education and students who have completed their first year. Examining how students\' aesthetic evaluations for interior design evolve over the course of their interior architecture education provides valuable insights into design education. The results illustrated that there is a significant difference between evaluations of aesthetic pleasure and novelty. The students who finished the first year have less aesthetic pleasure and novelty scores than the students who just started their university education. The first year of education may reduce aesthetic appreciation because basic design education aims to teach students to think critically.
Keywords : APID ölçeği, Estetik Memnuniyet, İç Mimarlık eğitimi, Temel Tasarım dersi