IAD Index of Academic Documents
  • Home Page
  • About
    • About Izmir Academy Association
    • About IAD Index
    • IAD Team
    • IAD Logos and Links
    • Policies
    • Contact
  • Submit A Journal
  • Submit A Conference
  • Submit Paper/Book
    • Submit a Preprint
    • Submit a Book
  • Contact
  • Koşuyolu Kalp Dergisi
  • Volume:25 Issue:2
  • Effect of Aortic Angulation on Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with the Self-Exp...

Effect of Aortic Angulation on Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with the Self-Expanding Portico Valve

Authors : Serkan ASLAN, Aysel TÜRKVATAN, Ahmet GÜNER, Serkan KAHRAMAN, Ümit BULUT, Gökhan DEMİRCİ, Enes ARSLAN, Ömer ÇELİK, Mehmet ERTÜRK
Pages : 132-140
View : 17 | Download : 9
Publication Date : 2022-08-20
Article Type : Research Paper
Abstract :Introduction: Aortic angulation (AA), defined as the angle between the aortic annulus plane and the horizontal plane, may result in failed prosthesis positioning. The effect of AA on the procedural and short-term outcomes with the portico valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of AA on device success and early outcomes of TAVI using a selfexpanding portico valve. Patients and Methods: Preoperative computed tomography scans of 121 consecutive patients treated with the portico valve were analyzed. TAVI device success and outcomes were determined according to VARC-3 definitions. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean AA. Results: The mean AA was 48.7 ± 8.9°. There were no differences in technical success (92.2 vs 89.5%, p= 0.604), device success (81.2% vs 77.2%, p= 0.582), and early safety endpoints (68.8% vs 61.4%, p= 0.397) between the AA≤ 48° and AA> 48° groups. The frequency and severity of paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) was statistically higher in patients with AA> 48° (p= 0.028). Moreover, an increased AA was also associated with valve malposition (12.3% vs. 1.6%, p= 0.018), prolonged procedure time (85 ± 26 vs. 75 ± 20 minutes, p= 0.028), and greater Δimplantation depth (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 mm; p< 0.001). Conclusion: Despite comparable device success and early outcomes rates, increased AA is associated with higher rates of PAR and valve malposition, with the self-expanding portico valve.
Keywords : Aortic angulation, computed tomography, self expanding valve, transcatheter aortic valve implantation

ORIGINAL ARTICLE URL
VIEW PAPER (PDF)

* There may have been changes in the journal, article,conference, book, preprint etc. informations. Therefore, it would be appropriate to follow the information on the official page of the source. The information here is shared for informational purposes. IAD is not responsible for incorrect or missing information.


Index of Academic Documents
İzmir Academy Association
CopyRight © 2023-2025